SERVING CLIENTS NATIONWIDE   |   (512) 814-8522   |   ILLINOIS OFFICE OPEN NOW

Blog Layout

Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (WARN)

Kaplan Law • Jul 01, 2024

The WARN Act plays a vital role in safeguarding the rights of workers. It ensures that employers cannot carry out significant workforce reductions without providing at least 60 days’ advance notice and appropriate compensation.

But far too frequently, companies fail to provide the required notice before plant closures and mass layoffs, leaving workers not only unemployed but feeling betrayed and exploited.


However, in the face of an unforeseen plant closure or mass layoff, affected employees have recourse to protect their rights. They have the option to pursue legal action, such as filing a lawsuit, in order to recover the rightful back pay they are owed. This avenue empowers employees to defend themselves against the negative consequences of such sudden and disruptive employment events.


What is the WARN Act?

In the event of an impending closure or mass layoff, the WARN Act provides employees the opportunity to search for alternative employment while still receiving compensation.


The WARN Act, passed in 1988, safeguards workers and their families by mandating that companies with 100 or more employees give 60 days’ notice before any closures or mass layoffs.


Additionally, WARN stipulates that employers must notify the state-dislocated worker unit, the chief elected official in the area, as well as the employee’s representatives (e.g., a labor union) of any closures or mass layoffs. In addition, employers who fail to send notice of layoffs or plant closures to a division of local government can incur a $500 civil fine per day of noncompliance.


What types of layoffs fall under the jurisdiction of the WARN Act?

  • Plant closures
  • Mass layoffs (e.g., a large-scale RIF or layoff)


What’s considered a plant closure under the WARN Act?

The WARN Act defines a plant closure as an employer closing a location or operations unit at a certain employment site, resulting in at least 50 full-time employees being laid off or terminated.


What’s considered a mass layoff under the WARN Act?

Under the WARN Act, a mass layoff occurs when an employer terminates 50-500 full-time employees within a 30-day period of time. The number of laid-off employees must reflect at least one-third of the total number of full-time employees at a particular employment site.


A mass layoff also arises automatically when a business lays off 500 or more full-time workers at a given location within 30 days, regardless of workforce size.


What are the exceptions to the WARN Act?

The WARN Act contains three major exceptions. The 60-day notice requirement may be waived for employers who can establish that layoffs or plant closures are the results of a “faltering company, unforeseen business circumstances, or natural disasters.”


Faltering company. This applies to plant closures and covers situations where a company aims to find new capital and/or business in an effort to stay open but believes giving advance notice of closure would undermine that effort.

Unforeseeable business circumstances. This applies to closures and mass layoffs caused by unforeseeable business problems that occurred at the time notice would otherwise have been due.


Natural disaster. This applies in circumstances where a business closure or mass layoff takes place as an immediate result of a natural disaster, such as a hurricane, earthquake, drought, etc.


In such cases, the WARN Act mandates companies to offer their employees as much warning as feasible. The notices must provide a brief justification for the reduced notice period when they are issued, and the notice must be in writing.


Who is protected under the WARN Act?

Those protected under the WARN Act include:

  • Full-time employees who work 20 or more hours a week and have been with said company for a minimum of 6 months,
  • Hourly and salaried employees, and
  • Managerial and supervisory employees.


WARN applies to private, for-profit, and nonprofit workplaces, as well as quasi-public organizations. However, federal, state, or local governmental organizations that provide public services do not have protection under WARN.


Are remote workers covered under WARN?

Remote workers are eligible to WARN Act protections as long as they fulfill the requirements of those protected under the Act (see section above).


Are temporary workers covered under WARN?

Employees contracted with the awareness that their position would be temporary are not covered under the WARN Act. Therefore, temporary employees are often unprotected.


What states are protected under the WARN Act?

All 50 states are protected under the federal WARN Act.


Many states, however, have their own state-specific WARN Act laws that oftentimes offer employees more protections than the federal WARN Act.

These states include:

  • California
  • Illinois
  • Maryland
  • New Jersey
  • New York
  • Tennessee


While the states listed above have their own versions of the WARN Act, Texas does not offer its own state-specific statutes.


What type of notice is an acceptable form of notice?

WARN stipulates that “any reasonable method of delivery… designed to ensure receipt of notice” is an appropriate form of notice.

Examples of the appropriate forms of notice include:

  • Email
  • First-class mail
  • Hand delivery or in-person delivery


What type of notice is not an acceptable form of notice?

  • Through workplace gossip
  • Private work chats (slack, messenger, etc.)


What if I was on vacation during the official notice?

If you were out sick, on vacation, or not on-site during the official notice of layoffs, you are owed the same warning as every other employee.


What about my benefits?

Companies who violate WARN may be held accountable for back pay and benefits, such as the cost of health insurance, to each affected employee for up to 60 days.


Should I sign a severance agreement?

In situations that involve plant closures or mass layoffs, companies may provide their employees with alternative severance agreements. Since these severance agreements are not required by law, employers can and do trick employees into waiving their WARN rights for payments of less than the 60 days they are owed.


We recommend that all employees stay actively aware of what they are signing and consult with legal experts, such as those here at Kaplan Law, prior to signing a severance agreement.


Who is responsible for notice in the event of a sale of business?

When a business is being sold in whole or in part, the following conditions must be satisfied under WARN.

  • If the sale of business results in plant closures or mass layoffs those protected under the WARN Act (see section above titled “Who is protected under the WARN Act?”) must be given a minimum of 60 days’ notice by the seller.
  • If the sale does not lead to a covered plant closing or a mass layoff, no notice is necessary.
  • Any plant closures or mass layoffs that take place after the date/time of the sale must be disclosed by the buyer.
By Kaplan Law 01 Jul, 2024
Warehouse and logistics providers including Amazon and XPO have been on the receiving end of lawsuits recently.
By Kaplan Law 15 Jun, 2024
The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) prohibits discrimination in the workplace based on a person’s intention to join the uniformed services, current service in the armed forces, or former service in the uniformed services.
By Kaplan Law 01 Jun, 2024
The Shady Practices That Make Shady Med Spas Med spas have become increasingly popular in Texas as more and more people seek cosmetic treatments without undergoing invasive procedures. While many med spas operate with integrity, some, unfortunately, take shortcuts that violate Texas laws, putting their customers and employees at risk. What is a Med Spa? A Med Spa combines a conventional day spa and a medical clinic. While day spas are limited to relaxation including massages, facials, and body therapies, med spas involve non-surgical and non-invasive treatments such as micro-needling, laser skin resurfacing, and hair removal. Who Can Own a Med Spa? In Texas, because med spas are medical practices they must adhere to state laws governing professional entities. These laws dictate that only physicians can be the rightful owners of medical practices, with certain exceptions granted to podiatrists, chiropractors, optometrists, and in some cases, physician assistants. Consequently, nurse practitioners and unlicensed individuals are prohibited from entering into partnerships with physicians for med spa ownership. Furthermore, med spas can only be legally structured as professional limited liability companies (PLLC) or professional associations (PA), precluding them from adopting the forms of corporations or regular limited liability companies (LLC). Who regulates Med Spas in Texas? External regulation: Medical spas in Texas are subject to strict oversight by regulatory bodies such as the Texas Medical Board, the Texas Department of License and Regulation, the Texas Department of State Health Services, and federal agencies. These regulators actively crack down on non-compliant med spas. Internal regulation: Since a licensed physician must supervise Nurse practitioners and physician assistants (“midlevel practitioners”). The physicians are given the title of Medical Director who, just as in a hospital, is responsible for all medical protocols and policies. How do med spas violate Texas Laws? One way that med spas in Texas violate the law is by employing unlicensed practitioners to perform medical procedures such as Botox injections and laser treatments. A valid medical practitioner’s license is required for these procedures as it ensures that practitioners have met the state’s standards of competency through proper education and training. Licensing helps protect patient safety by ensuring adherence to professional standards and ethics. Adhering to the legal requirement of employing licensed practitioners demonstrates a med spa’s commitment to quality care and most importantly, patient safety. In Texas, only licensed physicians can order or perform medical procedures without supervision. Nurse practitioners and midlevel practitioners must be supervised by a licensed physician as required by the Texas Medical Practice Act and the rules of the Texas Medical Board. In a notable case, a supervising physician for a med spa discovered that the clinic had employed a registered nurse (RN) to “order” and administer Botox injections without the necessary supervision. Upon learning of this violation, the physician promptly resigned from the clinic and reported the incident to the Texas Medical Board. As a result, the Texas Medical Board took action and imposed civil penalties against the clinic. Moreover, Med spas can violate regulations by offering unauthorized procedures that are beyond the scope of their licensing. While they may provide non-surgical treatments like facial rejuvenation and non-invasive body contouring, surgical procedures such as liposuction, breast augmentation, and facelift surgeries require specialized training and qualifications. Consequences Growing at the rate that they are, it is concerning if med spas are not complying with legal and ethical standards. They must comply with a range of laws and regulations related to medical procedures. Failure to meet these requirements can result in significant consequences for all parties involved. Consequences for Employers: Employers who neglect their legal responsibilities in med spas may face legal actions and potential lawsuits from employees, customers, or regulatory authorities. These repercussions can include fines, penalties, loss of reputation, and even the possibility of closure or loss of business licenses. Consequences for Employees: When employers fail to ensure proper training and licensing for employees, it puts the employees themselves at risk. Unqualified employees may face disciplinary action, legal consequences, and damage to their professional reputation. In some cases, they may also face personal liability for any harm caused to customers due to their lack of competence or negligence. Consequences for Customers: Customers who seek treatments or procedures in med spas that do not comply with legal responsibilities face significant risks. They may experience physical injuries, infections, or other adverse effects due to the negligence or incompetence of improperly trained or unlicensed practitioners. In such cases, customers have the right to pursue legal action against the med spa for compensation, and the spa may be held liable for the damages caused. While med spas can provide valuable services to customers, some med spas in Texas take shortcuts. Med spas that violate guidelines can face serious consequences. Customers and employees alike should be vigilant in choosing med spas that operate with integrity and comply with all Texas laws and regulations related to medical procedures. Have a possible case? Reach out to an employment attorney in your state or contact us here at Kaplan Law Firm for a free online case evaluation to help figure out the best course of action for your case.
Share by: